Real World Speed
Performance profile from 136,896 user samples
31,221 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 77% MSI(1462 3680)
Poor: 77% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 621
105,675 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93.5 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
79 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
542 fps Much better texture detail.
+65%
329 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
188 fps 196 fps +4%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
370 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
293 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
294 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+48%
198 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
626 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+67%
375 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
198 fps 216 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
416 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+29%
322 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
311 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+39%
223 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
223 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+13%
197 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 124 fps +1%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+29%
81 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+9%
80 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
188 fps 218 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+16%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
128 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+11%
115 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps 98 fps +1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+7%
83 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
214 fps 242 fps Slightly Better Minecraft fps.
+13%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps 88 fps +4%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+5%
120 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,185,331 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.4 % 0.54 % Much higher market share.
+35%
Value
Value For Money
44.3 % Slightly better value.
+14%
39 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % +2% 104 %
Price
Price (score)
$500 $480 +4%
Age
Newest
25 Months Much more recent.
+52%
52 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
372 fps +5% 355 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
247 fps 318 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+29%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
327 fps +3% 317 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
234 fps 288 fps Better reflection handling.
+23%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback