Real World Speed
Performance profile from 305,706 user samples
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 714
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
86.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
79 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps Better lighting effects.
+13%
98.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
108 fps 115 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
92.3 fps 97 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+5%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
132 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
97.7 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
122 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
111 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
114 fps 132 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
95.4 fps 105 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+10%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
143 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+34%
107 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
223 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+14%
196 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps +0% 121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+28%
81 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+11%
80 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
194 Fps 215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+11%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+11%
115 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 98 Fps +1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+7%
82 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
202 Fps 244 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+21%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 Fps 91 Fps +2%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps +4% 121 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,427,073 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.17 % Hugely higher market share.
+467%
Value
Value For Money
51.3 % Much better value.
+53%
33.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 66 % More popular.
+25%
Price
Price (score)
$400 Cheaper.
+29%
$560
Age
Newest
80 Months More recent.
+25%
107 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
197 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+74%
113 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.4 fps 97.4 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
178 fps Much better texture detail.
+78%
100 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
75.8 fps 87.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback