Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,007,439 user samples
946,701 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 33% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 27% MSI(1462 8C96)
Poor: 27% Great: 33%
SPEED RANK: 173rd / 713
60,738 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 199th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
29.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+33%
22 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
37.3 fps Much better lighting effects.
+39%
26.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
41.1 fps Much better reflection handling.
+46%
28.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
37.2 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+37%
27.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
38.8 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
31.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
43.5 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+41%
30.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
48.5 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+62%
30 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
38.4 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+33%
28.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
42.7 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
35.6 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+9%
110 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+46%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 Fps 50 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+14%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
135 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+11%
121 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
169 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+37%
123 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+42%
72 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,771,497 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.77 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,440%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
118 % Insanely better value.
+1,027%
10.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
78 % Much more popular.
+39%
56 %
Price
Price (score)
$59 Hugely cheaper.
+88%
$500
Age
Newest
96 Months 90 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
41 fps 42.4 fps +3%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
28.7 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+5%
27.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
37.6 fps 37.8 fps +1%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
26.2 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
24.2 fps

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. [Oct '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $284WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback