UserBenchmark: AMD R9 390 vs Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

BUY • $119

AMD

BUY • $325

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 709,910 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

627,793 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 48% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB

Poor: 48% Great: 56%

SPEED RANK: 123^rd / 714

82,117 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 45% PwrHis(1787 2358) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 45% Great: 52%

SPEED RANK: 131^st / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		52 %	+5%		49.7 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	63.8 fps		64.1 fps	+0%
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	68.3 fps		72.4 fps	Slightly better reflection handling. +6%
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	65.2 fps	+3%	63.6 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	66 fps	Faster NBody calculation. +11%	59.2 fps


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	68.7 fps		68.9 fps	+0%
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	96.2 fps	Better peak reflection handling. +25%	76.9 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	68.5 fps	+4%	65.7 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	70.3 fps	Faster peak NBody calculation. +14%	61.9 fps


CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	150 Fps		156 Fps	+4%
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	98 Fps	Slightly Better Fortnite Fps. +6%	93 Fps
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	64 Fps	Better PUBG Fps. +18%	55 Fps
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	60 Fps	Much Better GTAV Fps. +32%	45 Fps
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	148 Fps		173 Fps	Better LoL Fps. +17%
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	100 Fps		100 Fps	+0%
BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	55 Fps		67 Fps	Better BF1 Fps. +22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	51 Fps		55 Fps	Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +8%
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	184 Fps	Much Better Minecraft Fps. +38%	133 Fps
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	116 Fps	Better DOTA 2 Fps. +11%	104 Fps
WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	61 Fps	Better WoW Fps. +21%	50 Fps
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	95 Fps		104 Fps	Slightly Better WoT Fps. +9%

Market Share

Based on 67,405,385 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	1 %	Insanely higher market share. +9,900%	0.01 %
Value Value For Money	103 %	Hugely better value. +186%	36.2 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	66 %	Slightly more popular. +6%	62 %
Price Price (score)	$119	Much cheaper. +63%	$325


Age Newest	92 Months	More recent. +13%	106 Months
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	66.6 fps		94.4 fps	Much better peak texture detail. +42%
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	65.1 fps	Much faster peak complex splatting. +39%	46.7 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	60.7 fps		86.6 fps	Much better texture detail. +43%
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	60.2 fps	Much faster complex splatting. +34%	44.9 fps

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. ^{[Sep '16 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. ^{[Jun '15 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback