CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
163 EFps 204 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+25%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
50 EFps 98 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+96%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
60 EFps 121 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+102%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
61 EFps 102 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+67%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
68 EFps 134 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+97%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 323,014 user samples
295,870 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% MSI(1462 3285)
Worst Bench: 47% EVGA(3842 6167) 3GB; ssc
Poor: 47% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 622
27,144 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E411)
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52.1 % 114 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+119%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
191 fps 772 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+304%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 236 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+61%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
195 fps 394 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+102%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
153 fps 355 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+132%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
214 fps 862 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+303%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps 245 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+59%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps 422 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+103%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
167 fps 372 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+123%
Market Share
Based on 21,503,643 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.93 % Slightly higher market share.
+14%
1.69 %
Value
Value For Money
72.6 % Slightly better value.
+9%
66.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
103 % 123 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+58%
$404
Age
Newest
39 Months 4 Months Hugely more recent.
+90%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
217 fps 443 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+104%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
186 fps 308 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+66%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
202 fps 403 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+100%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
174 fps 295 fps Much better reflection handling.
+70%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback