CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
163 EFps 171 EFps +5%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
50 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+19%
42 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
60 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+25%
48 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
61 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+36%
45 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
68 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+15%
59 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 296,371 user samples
289,187 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 3721)
Worst Bench: 48% Device(7377 0000) 3GB
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 621
7,184 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 45% EVGA(3842 1151) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% MSI(1462 3800) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 45%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52.4 % Faster effective speed.
+25%
41.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
192 fps Better texture detail.
+25%
154 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+58%
93.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
196 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+29%
152 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
154 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+36%
113 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
216 fps Better peak texture detail.
+26%
171 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
156 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+62%
96.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
210 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
160 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
168 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40%
120 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,908,434 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+249%
0.53 %
Value
Value For Money
73.1 % Slightly better value.
+10%
66.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
101 % 115 % Slightly more popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score)
$170 $150 Slightly cheaper.
+12%
Age
Newest
38 Months 5 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
220 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
190 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
189 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+28%
148 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
203 fps Better lighting effects.
+16%
175 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps Better reflection handling.
+25%
140 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback