Dust 2 1080p Max
174 EFps 188 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
60 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
49 EFps
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
72 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
56 EFps
M249 Training 1080p Max
72 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
49 EFps
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
79 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
69 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 489,274 user samples
406,996 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% MSI(1462 3287)
Worst Bench: 49% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
Poor: 49% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 652
82,278 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% MSI(1462 8D92)
Worst Bench: 40% Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 40% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 92nd / 652
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52.8 % Faster effective speed.
43.2 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
64.3 fps Better lighting effects.
56 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.2 fps Better reflection handling.
59.4 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
66 fps Much faster multi rendering.
47.6 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
66.7 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
51.2 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
68.5 fps Better peak lighting effects.
60.9 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
99.4 fps Better peak reflection handling.
79 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.4 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
64.7 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70.9 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
54.2 fps
Market Share
Based on 38,292,067 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.56 % Much higher market share.
1 %
Value For Money
59.7 % 66.1 % Better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % 77 % More popular.
Price (score)
$210 $155 Cheaper.
53 Months 20 Months Much more recent.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
67.5 fps Better peak texture detail.
54.6 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
65.4 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
48.4 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
61.2 fps Better texture detail.
49.6 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
59 fps Much faster complex splatting.
43.7 fps

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]


The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $208Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback