CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
174 EFps 240 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+38%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
60 EFps 86 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+43%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
72 EFps 99 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+38%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
72 EFps 93 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+29%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
79 EFps 120 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+52%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 733,559 user samples
464,338 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Asus(1043 863B) 3GB
Worst Bench: 48% Zotac(19DA 4438) 3GB
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 666
269,221 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% PNY(196E 1313) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 666
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52.7 % 76.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+44%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
64.3 fps 97.2 fps Much better lighting effects.
+51%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.1 fps 99.9 fps Much better reflection handling.
+43%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.9 fps 97.6 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+48%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
66.5 fps 89.7 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
68.9 fps 104 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+51%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
98.3 fps 137 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+39%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
69.5 fps 106 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+53%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70.6 fps 95.1 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
Market Share
Based on 46,246,199 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.23 % Much higher market share.
+31%
0.94 %
Value
Value For Money
54.3 % 64.4 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % 79 % More popular.
+20%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Cheaper.
+18%
$280
Age
Newest
61 Months 31 Months Much more recent.
+49%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
67.5 fps 96.6 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+43%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
65.2 fps 81 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
61.2 fps 87.3 fps Much better texture detail.
+43%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
59.8 fps 74.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
+24%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback