Real World Speed
Performance profile from 288,774 user samples
187,440 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 60% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 3GB; Fake GTX 1060 3GB
Poor: 60% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 599
101,334 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 72% MSI(1462 3233)
Poor: 72% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 21st / 599
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.4 % 97.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+47%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
191 fps 322 fps Much better texture detail.
+69%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps 192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+32%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
195 fps 287 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+47%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
154 fps 195 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
216 fps 378 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+75%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
161 fps 214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+33%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps 326 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+54%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
169 fps 225 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
151 fps 201 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+33%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66 fps 80 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+22%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61 fps 81 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+34%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps 121 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+24%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps 227 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+42%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 116 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+25%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 97 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+77%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+67%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps 154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+31%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps 91 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+53%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps 119 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+32%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 123 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+49%
Market Share
Based on 13,811,804 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.53 % Hugely higher market share.
+224%
0.78 %
Value
Value For Money
103 % Much better value.
+38%
74.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 116 % More popular.
+18%
Price
Price (score)
$190 Much cheaper.
+65%
$550
Age
Newest
29 Months Much more recent.
+34%
44 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
221 fps 370 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps 322 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
200 fps 313 fps Much better lighting effects.
+56%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
174 fps 283 fps Much better reflection handling.
+63%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $366Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $209Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $85
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $800SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $132SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback