Real World Speed
Performance profile from 593,841 user samples
550,267 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Gigabyte(1458 371A)
Worst Bench: 60% Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 611
43,574 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 55% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 611
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
66.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
209 fps 259 fps Better texture detail.
+24%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Faster multi rendering.
+16%
127 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
205 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+19%
172 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
161 fps 178 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+11%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
237 fps 286 fps Better peak texture detail.
+21%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
164 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+24%
132 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
225 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+25%
180 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
177 fps 187 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps +2% 158 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+17%
59 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+27%
80 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+33%
46 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
187 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+8%
174 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps +2% 100 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps +3% 68 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+8%
53 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
136 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+17%
117 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
77 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+49%
51 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
106 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
99 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps +1% 98 fps
Market Share
Based on 15,593,107 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
5.16 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,885%
0.26 %
Value
Value For Money
96.1 % Better value.
+27%
75.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
176 % Much more popular.
+69%
104 %
Price
Price (score)
$230 Cheaper.
+24%
$304
Age
Newest
32 Months More recent.
+29%
45 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
245 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+15%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
212 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+28%
165 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
219 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+13%
193 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
193 fps Better reflection handling.
+23%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $75
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $110SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback