Real World Speed
Performance profile from 792,018 user samples
747,470 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3739)
Worst Bench: 51% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 625
44,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 33% Asus(1043 04B0)
Poor: 33% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.2 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
43.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
212 fps 225 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+31%
159 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+36%
120 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 264 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+10%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
161 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
138 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
223 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+23%
182 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
177 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40%
126 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Better CSGO Fps.
+15%
139 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+22%
83 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Better PUBG Fps.
+20%
57 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+22%
49 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+35%
134 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+15%
88 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+42%
49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
57 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+18%
48 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
217 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+99%
109 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+37%
96 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+54%
50 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 fps Better WoT Fps.
+28%
82 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,548,579 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.45 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,434%
0.29 %
Value
Value For Money
46.8 % 81.7 % Much better value.
+75%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
127 % Much more popular.
+41%
90 %
Price
Price (score)
$285 $126 Much cheaper.
+56%
Age
Newest
40 Months 39 Months +2%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
243 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
192 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
210 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+21%
173 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps Much better lighting effects.
+43%
155 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
194 fps Better reflection handling.
+19%
163 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback