Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,373,567 user samples
1,368,019 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 371D)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 3490) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 119th / 714
5,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 293% XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 216% PowerColor(148C 2422) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 216% Great: 293%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.1 % 257 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+358%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
69.6 fps 327 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+370%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
76.8 fps 435 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+466%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.8 fps 519 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+689%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70 fps 303 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+333%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
75.4 fps 392 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+420%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
109 fps 520 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+377%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
70.1 fps 578 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+725%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
74.9 fps 335 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+347%
Market Share
Based on 67,419,594 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+836%
0.22 %
Value
Value For Money
114 % Hugely better value.
+87%
60.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
88 % Much more popular.
+52%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$117 Hugely cheaper.
+88%
$1,000
Age
Newest
93 Months 16 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
73.3 fps 848 fps Insanely better peak texture detail.
+1,057%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70.6 fps 502 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+611%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
66.9 fps 761 fps Insanely better texture detail.
+1,038%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
65.7 fps 460 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+600%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card provided prices settle appropriately. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Dec '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback