Real World Speed
Performance profile from 667,041 user samples
412,133 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% MSI(1462 C300)
Worst Bench: 86% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 86% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 73rd / 714
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93.7 % 98.3 % +5%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
118 fps 124 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+5%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
135 fps 139 fps +3%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.1 fps 118 fps Faster multi rendering.
+27%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps 140 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+14%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps 133 fps +3%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+30%
146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
99 fps 122 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+23%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
133 fps 151 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
200 Fps 242 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+21%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
129 Fps 167 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+29%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps +1% 94 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 Fps 117 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+39%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
204 Fps 225 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+10%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps 135 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps 115 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+25%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
259 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+20%
215 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,458,455 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.77 % Hugely higher market share.
+141%
0.32 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 117 % Much better value.
+58%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % More popular.
+21%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$299 $199 Much cheaper.
+33%
Age
Newest
77 Months 57 Months More recent.
+26%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
133 fps 229 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+72%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
118 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+20%
98.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps 205 fps Much better texture detail.
+72%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
110 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
94.3 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is Nvidia’s latest HD and VR ready, gaming GPU and is successor to the current number one GPU by market share, the GTX 1070. Like the 1070, the 1070 Ti is based on the16nm Pascal architecture and GP104 GPU. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256 bit memory interface producing a total memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s, and both have a rated boost clock speed of 1.683 GHz. The 1070 Ti is basically the 1070 with 25% more working CUDA cores (2432 versus 1920) and slightly higher base clock of 1607MHz (versus 1506MHz in the 1070). This translates to the 1070 Ti being nearly as powerful as the GTX 1080 which has 2560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDRR5X memory and boost clock of 1733 GHz. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The rumored fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. [Nov '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback