Real World Speed
Performance profile from 108,351 user samples
93,716 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 128% EVGA(3842 5671)
Worst Bench: 97% MSI(1462 C303)
Poor: 97% Great: 128%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 599
14,635 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 134% Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 73% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 599
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
115 % 119 % +4%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
375 fps 522 fps Much better texture detail.
+39%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
201 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
185 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
362 fps 365 fps +1%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
235 fps 288 fps Faster complex splatting.
+23%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
428 fps 626 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+46%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
224 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
192 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
407 fps 418 fps +3%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
264 fps 304 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+15%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
200 fps 219 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+9%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 99 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+12%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86 fps 86 fps +0%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
129 fps 149 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+15%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps 126 fps +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+9%
84 fps
Market Share
Based on 13,884,064 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+359%
0.49 %
Value
Value For Money
117 % Much better value.
+39%
84 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % More popular.
+15%
78 %
Price
Price (score)
$359 Much cheaper.
+42%
$620
Age
Newest
14 Months More recent.
+18%
17 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
411 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+11%
369 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
389 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+60%
243 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
364 fps Better lighting effects.
+20%
304 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
345 fps Much better reflection handling.
+51%
229 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is NVIDIA’s latest HD and VR ready, gaming GPU and is successor to the current number one GPU by market share, the GTX 1070. Like the 1070, the 1070 Ti is based on the16nm Pascal architecture and GP104 GPU. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256 bit memory interface producing a total memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s, and both have a rated boost clock speed of 1.683 GHz, although both are geared to be over clocked. In fact, the 1070 Ti is basically the 1070 but with 25% more working CUDA cores (2432 versus 1920) and slightly higher base clock of 1607MHz (versus 1506MHz in the 1070). This translates to the 1070 Ti being as nearly as powerful as the GTX 1080 which has 2560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDRR5X memory and boost clock of 1733 GHz. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The rumoured fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. [Nov '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $363Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback