Real World Speed
Performance profile from 642,926 user samples
412,133 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% MSI(1462 C300)
Worst Bench: 86% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 86% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 73rd / 714
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
68.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
118 fps Much better lighting effects.
+31%
90.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
135 fps Much better reflection handling.
+49%
90.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.1 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+45%
64.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+57%
78.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+33%
97.1 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+57%
121 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
99 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+45%
68.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
133 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+61%
82.7 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
200 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+56%
128 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
129 Fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
+8%
120 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+17%
81 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+12%
76 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
204 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+11%
183 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+22%
102 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+45%
63 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
259 Fps 306 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+18%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
150 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+15%
131 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+10%
117 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,446,731 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.78 % Higher market share.
+13%
0.69 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 113 % Much better value.
+53%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 76 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$299 $143 Much cheaper.
+52%
Age
Newest
77 Months 61 Months More recent.
+21%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
133 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+57%
84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
118 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+58%
74.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps Much better texture detail.
+57%
75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
110 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+57%
70 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is Nvidia’s latest HD and VR ready, gaming GPU and is successor to the current number one GPU by market share, the GTX 1070. Like the 1070, the 1070 Ti is based on the16nm Pascal architecture and GP104 GPU. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256 bit memory interface producing a total memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s, and both have a rated boost clock speed of 1.683 GHz. The 1070 Ti is basically the 1070 with 25% more working CUDA cores (2432 versus 1920) and slightly higher base clock of 1607MHz (versus 1506MHz in the 1070). This translates to the 1070 Ti being nearly as powerful as the GTX 1080 which has 2560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDRR5X memory and boost clock of 1733 GHz. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The rumored fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. [Nov '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback