CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
275 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+15%
240 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
104 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+21%
86 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+39%
99 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
132 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+42%
93 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
138 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+15%
120 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 934,638 user samples
767,532 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 119% Asus(1043 85AA)
Worst Bench: 90% Asus(1043 85AA)
Poor: 90% Great: 119%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 650
167,106 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 86C8) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
78.4 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
401 fps Much better lighting effects.
+36%
295 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
238 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
219 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
397 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+52%
262 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
453 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+41%
322 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
258 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
237 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
437 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+56%
280 fps
Market Share
Based on 35,640,369 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.48 % Hugely higher market share.
+97%
1.26 %
Value
Value For Money
55.8 % 66.3 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % 148 % Much more popular.
+38%
Price
Price (score)
$450 $280 Much cheaper.
+38%
Age
Newest
53 Months 21 Months Much more recent.
+60%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
411 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+62%
253 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
464 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+53%
304 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
268 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40%
191 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
373 fps Much better reflection handling.
+59%
235 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
413 fps Much better texture detail.
+52%
272 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
243 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+40%
173 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1080 is Nvidia’s new flagship graphics card. It features the new 16 nm (down from 28 nm) Pascal architecture. This is the first die shrink since the release of the GTX 680 at which time the manufacturing process shrunk from 40 nm down to 28 nm. In terms of typical 3D gaming performance the 1080 is around 30% faster than the GTX 980 Ti and it manages to deliver the additional performance with a TDP of just 180 Watts which is 70 Watts less than the 980 Ti. The new Pascal architecture delivers a satisfying jump in performance over Maxwell and the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single GPU available. Over the coming months older generation cards will likely see significant price drops as the better value for money 1070, 1060 and 1050 cards slowly replace their predecessors. [May '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $144Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback