CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
188 EFps 229 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+22%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
49 EFps 110 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+124%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
56 EFps 138 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+146%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
49 EFps 127 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+159%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
69 EFps 157 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+128%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 327,237 user samples
71,320 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% MSI(1462 3800)
Worst Bench: 41% MSI(1462 8D92)
Poor: 41% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 89th / 651
255,917 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% XFX(1682 5701)
Worst Bench: 98% MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 98% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
44.4 % 107 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+140%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
55.9 fps 134 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+140%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
59.6 fps 143 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+140%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
48.2 fps 116 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+141%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
51.2 fps 136 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+166%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
60.7 fps 149 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+145%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
78.6 fps 150 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+91%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.7 fps 121 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+87%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
54.3 fps 148 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+173%
Market Share
Based on 36,087,486 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.93 % 2.48 % Hugely higher market share.
+167%
Value
Value For Money
67.9 % Slightly better value.
+7%
63.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
136 % +4% 131 %
Price
Price (score)
$155 Much cheaper.
+61%
$400
Age
Newest
19 Months 16 Months More recent.
+16%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
54.7 fps 250 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+357%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
49.3 fps 100 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+103%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
50 fps 206 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+312%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
44.9 fps 95.8 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+113%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback