COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
Nvidia
VS
About
Game EFps  
+34%
CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max 		171 EFps 193 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+13%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		42 EFps 60 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+43%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		48 EFps 65 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+35%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max 		45 EFps 70 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+56%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		59 EFps 74 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+25%
Effective Speed 
+34%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 756,446 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
8,976 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 44% Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% Zotac(19DA 1556) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 44%
SPEED RANK: 72nd / 625
747,470 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3739)
Worst Bench: 51% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		41.8 % 56.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+34%
Average User Bench 
+44%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		154 fps 212 fps Much better texture detail.
+38%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		93.3 fps 148 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+59%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		152 fps 208 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+37%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		113 fps 163 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+44%
Overclocked Bench 
+49%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		171 fps 240 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+40%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		95.9 fps 161 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+68%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		160 fps 223 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+39%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		119 fps 177 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+49%
Value & Sentiment 
+193%
Market Share
Based on 21,549,003 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.47 % 4.44 % Hugely higher market share.
+845%
Value
Value For Money 		66.1 % Much better value.
+41% 		46.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		111 % 127 % Slightly more popular.
+14%
Price
Price (score) 		$150 Much cheaper.
+47% 		$285
Nice To Haves 
+11%
Age
Newest 		6 Months Hugely more recent.
+85% 		40 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		188 fps 243 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		147 fps 210 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+43%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		174 fps 222 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		140 fps 194 fps Much better reflection handling.
+39%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 41.8%
Average Bench 56.2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
8,976
747,470
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop Workstation

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Test your PC Build a PC
Can You Run It?
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback