CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps +5% 229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
66 EFps 110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+67%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
77 EFps 138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+79%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
80 EFps 127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+59%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
93 EFps 157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+69%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 537,992 user samples
123,523 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 401B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 56% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 667
414,469 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Gigabyte(1458 2316) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 95% ASRock(1849 5101) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 95% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 667
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
60.3 % 104 % Much faster effective speed.
+73%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
77.3 fps 128 fps Much better lighting effects.
+66%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
80.9 fps 141 fps Much better reflection handling.
+74%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.4 fps 116 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+83%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
73.1 fps 135 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+85%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
82.5 fps 139 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+68%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
108 fps 148 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+37%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
66.8 fps 121 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+81%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
77.5 fps 145 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+87%
Market Share
Based on 46,956,956 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.77 % 0.99 % Higher market share.
+29%
Value
Value For Money
30.7 % 61.9 % Hugely better value.
+101%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % More popular.
+19%
75 %
Price
Price (score)
$465 $400 Cheaper.
+14%
Age
Newest
23 Months More recent.
+15%
27 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
81.6 fps 228 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+179%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
63.1 fps 98.8 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+57%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
74.3 fps 199 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+168%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
59.1 fps 94.9 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+61%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback