COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
Game EFps  
+17%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		240 EFps +2% 236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		66 EFps 78 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+18%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		77 EFps 98 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+27%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		80 EFps 94 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+18%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		93 EFps 117 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+26%
Effective Speed 
+33%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 272,630 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
180,577 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% MSI(1462 8D95)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 401A)
Poor: 53% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 114th / 714
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		58.7 % 78 % Much faster effective speed.
+33%
Average Score 
+40%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		76.2 fps 98.3 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		79.5 fps 105 fps Much better reflection handling.
+32%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		62.3 fps 88.6 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+42%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		71.9 fps 114 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+59%
Overclocked Score 
+37%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		81.5 fps 109 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+34%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		107 fps 112 fps +5%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		66.4 fps 94.1 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+42%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		76.3 fps 128 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+68%
Value & Sentiment 
+155%
Market Share
Based on 67,418,982 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.51 % Hugely higher market share.
+750% 		0.06 %
Value
Value For Money 		46.3 % 109 % Hugely better value.
+135%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		86 % Much more popular.
+48% 		58 %
Price
Price (score) 		$300 $170 Much cheaper.
+43%
Nice To Haves 
+50%
Age
Newest 		53 Months Much more recent.
+34% 		80 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		80.5 fps 175 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+117%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		62.8 fps 77.6 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		72.9 fps 155 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+113%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		58.1 fps 74.5 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 58.7%
Average Bench 78%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
180,577
92,053
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback