Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,731 user samples
33,039 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% EVGA(3842 1263)
Worst Bench: 80% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 80% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
37,692 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% HP(103C 3421) 2GB
Worst Bench: 22% Asus(1043 04B2) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 22% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 122nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
91.5 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+225%
28.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
272 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+169%
101 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+247%
62.8 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
260 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+244%
75.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+128%
76.6 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
303 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+155%
119 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
231 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+254%
65.3 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+226%
85.6 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+135%
80.3 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+36%
116 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+171%
50 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+72%
41 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
179 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+55%
115 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps Hugely Better Overwatch fps.
+88%
59 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+176%
32 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
273 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+170%
101 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Hugely Better World of Tanks fps.
+198%
46 fps
Market Share
Based on 19,325,685 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.38 % Hugely higher market share.
+500%
0.23 %
Value
Value For Money
80.3 % Better value.
+26%
63.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
112 % Much more popular.
+35%
83 %
Price
Price (score)
$270 $105 Much cheaper.
+61%
Age
Newest
5 Months Hugely more recent.
+86%
36 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+262%
88.5 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+200%
83.9 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
293 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+301%
73 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
234 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+197%
78.8 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback