Real World Speed
Performance profile from 141,104 user samples
44,916 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
96,188 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% PowerColor(148C 2379)
Poor: 38% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 65th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+56%
47.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
274 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+11%
246 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+64%
135 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+51%
175 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+43%
123 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
303 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+8%
280 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
241 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+67%
144 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
280 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+46%
192 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+44%
132 fps
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Better CSGO fps.
+27%
125 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+66%
81 fps
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Much Better PUBG fps.
+55%
62 fps
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Much Better GTAV fps.
+42%
53 fps
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps Better LoL fps.
+25%
138 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
92 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+69%
50 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
287 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+121%
130 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+40%
111 fps
WoW
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Much Better WoW fps.
+36%
73 fps
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Much Better WoT fps.
+60%
85 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,862,682 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.42 % 1.71 % Higher market share.
+20%
Value
Value For Money
64.7 % 83.1 % Better value.
+28%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % Much more popular.
+32%
99 %
Price
Price (score)
$270 $135 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
7 Months Much more recent.
+77%
30 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
321 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+62%
198 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+39%
181 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps Much better lighting effects.
+72%
174 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Much better reflection handling.
+41%
167 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $338Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback