CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
214 EFps +5% 204 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
73 EFps 98 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+34%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
87 EFps 121 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+39%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 102 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+29%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
99 EFps 134 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+35%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 59,643 user samples
40,010 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 68% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 68% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 621
19,633 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 121% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 107% XFX(1682 5701) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 107% Great: 121%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.2 % 115 % Much faster effective speed.
+54%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
275 fps 771 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+180%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
222 fps 236 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
266 fps 394 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+48%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps 357 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+101%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
304 fps 847 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+179%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
240 fps 245 fps +2%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps 419 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+49%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
191 fps 372 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+95%
Market Share
Based on 20,740,869 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.43 % 1.76 % Higher market share.
+23%
Value
Value For Money
64 % 67.8 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
129 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
115 %
Price
Price (score)
$275 Much cheaper.
+31%
$400
Age
Newest
7 Months 3 Months Much more recent.
+57%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
323 fps 438 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+36%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps 309 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+22%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
301 fps 408 fps Much better lighting effects.
+36%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps 296 fps Better reflection handling.
+25%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for actually playing games with. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V8 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective fps (EFps) gaming metrics in due course. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm. They seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback