CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
232 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
217 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
75 EFps 97 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+29%
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
85 EFps 119 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+40%
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
80 EFps 113 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+41%
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
104 EFps 139 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+34%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 102,776 user samples
60,664 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FC5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 627
42,112 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 99% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.6 % 105 % Much faster effective speed.
+41%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
296 fps 403 fps Much better lighting effects.
+36%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps 237 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps 397 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+50%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps 441 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+37%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
236 fps 246 fps +4%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps 424 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+52%
Market Share
Based on 22,313,730 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.55 % 2.01 % Higher market share.
+30%
Value
Value For Money
65 % +2% 64 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
144 % More popular.
+22%
118 %
Price
Price (score)
$272 Much cheaper.
+30%
$390
Age
Newest
9 Months 5 Months Much more recent.
+44%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
251 fps 309 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+23%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps 866 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+187%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps 373 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+96%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps 296 fps Better reflection handling.
+25%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps 779 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+185%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps 358 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+103%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback