CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
220 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps 97 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+13%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
99 EFps 133 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+34%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps 125 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+34%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
120 EFps 143 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+19%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 198,455 user samples
157,041 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 648
41,414 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% PowerColor(148C 2399)
Worst Bench: 83% Sapphire(1DA2 E411)
Poor: 83% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 648
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.5 % 88.4 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
295 fps 339 fps Better lighting effects.
+15%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
208 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
264 fps 330 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+25%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
323 fps 395 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+22%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
230 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps 367 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
Market Share
Based on 34,490,424 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.19 % Hugely higher market share.
+310%
0.29 %
Value
Value For Money
69.2 % Better value.
+12%
61.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
149 % +1% 148 %
Price
Price (score)
$255 Cheaper.
+25%
$340
Age
Newest
20 Months 15 Months More recent.
+25%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
255 fps 288 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+13%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
306 fps 696 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+127%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
191 fps 353 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+85%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps 257 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
272 fps 610 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+124%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
171 fps 316 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+85%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $185Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback