CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps 240 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+30%
66 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
99 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+29%
77 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+16%
80 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
120 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+29%
93 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 76,129 user samples
74,325 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 635
1,804 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% EVGA(3842 1357)
Worst Bench: 55% Asus(1043 874B)
Poor: 55% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.6 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
58.4 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
297 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
232 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+56%
141 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
264 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
217 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
325 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+31%
248 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+71%
144 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
283 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+25%
227 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,913,598 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.48 % Hugely higher market share.
+410%
0.29 %
Value
Value For Money
68 % 81.4 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
144 % 158 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$260 $170 Much cheaper.
+35%
Age
Newest
11 Months 3 Months Much more recent.
+73%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
255 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
201 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
303 fps Better peak texture detail.
+18%
256 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
192 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+43%
134 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
235 fps Better reflection handling.
+23%
191 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
231 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+41%
126 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback