Real World Speed
Performance profile from 46,646 user samples
33,684 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% Asus(1043 86A6) ≥ 4GB; ROG-STRIX-GTX1660TI-A6G-GAMING, Asus ROG STRIX GAMING
Worst Bench: 80% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 80% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
12,962 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 2543)
Worst Bench: 71% Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
91.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+14%
79.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
270 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+13%
239 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+48%
147 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
260 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
232 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps +3% 170 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+14%
266 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
230 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+44%
160 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
278 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
247 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps +3% 183 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+28%
123 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+14%
118 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+29%
74 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps +4% 67 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
179 fps 180 fps +1%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+11%
100 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+36%
64 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
273 fps 291 fps Slightly Better Minecraft fps.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 19,344,851 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.4 % Much higher market share.
+73%
0.81 %
Value
Value For Money
80.2 % 86.1 % Slightly better value.
+7%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
112 % 117 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$270 $220 Cheaper.
+19%
Age
Newest
6 Months 5 Months More recent.
+17%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
300 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
251 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
232 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
291 fps +5% 278 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
233 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
217 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140AMD RX 580 $169Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback