COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
Nvidia
VS
Effective Speed 
+4%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 532,592 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 714
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		76 % 79 % +4%
Average Score 
+7%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		96.9 fps 98.6 fps +2%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		98.8 fps 115 fps Better reflection handling.
+16%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		96.9 fps 97 fps +0%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		89.4 fps 97.7 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+9%
Overclocked Score 
+5%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		104 fps 111 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		134 fps +2% 132 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		103 fps 105 fps +2%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		93.8 fps 107 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
Game FPS 
+4%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		156 Fps 196 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+25%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		133 Fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
+9% 		121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		88 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+9% 		81 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		74 Fps 80 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+8%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		181 Fps 215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+19%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		110 Fps 115 Fps +4%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		78 Fps 98 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		82 Fps +1% 82 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		263 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+8% 		244 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		147 Fps 153 Fps +4%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		93 Fps +2% 91 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		133 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+10% 		121 Fps
Value & Sentiment 
+156%
Market Share
Based on 67,459,287 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.84 % Hugely higher market share.
+250% 		0.24 %
Value
Value For Money 		126 % Hugely better value.
+276% 		33.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		82 % More popular.
+24% 		66 %
Price
Price (score) 		$143 Much cheaper.
+74% 		$560
Nice To Haves 
+6%
Age
Newest 		62 Months Much more recent.
+42% 		107 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		95.9 fps 113 fps Better peak texture detail.
+18%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		80.1 fps 97.4 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+22%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		87.6 fps 100 fps Better texture detail.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		75.7 fps 87.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 76%
Average Bench 79%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
318,562
214,030
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback