Real World Speed
Performance profile from 143,837 user samples
38,162 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 67% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 621
105,675 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % 79 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps 329 fps Better texture detail.
+21%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
196 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps 293 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+11%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps 198 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+13%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
301 fps 375 fps Better peak texture detail.
+25%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
238 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+10%
216 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps 322 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
191 fps 223 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+17%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps 197 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+23%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+9%
124 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+18%
81 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 80 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+6%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps 218 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps 115 fps +3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps +2% 83 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
287 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+19%
242 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps +2% 151 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+13%
88 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+14%
120 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,238,293 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.44 % Hugely higher market share.
+167%
0.54 %
Value
Value For Money
63.6 % Much better value.
+63%
39 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % Much more popular.
+33%
104 %
Price
Price (score)
$275 Much cheaper.
+43%
$480
Age
Newest
7 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
52 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
323 fps 355 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps 318 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+26%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps 317 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps 288 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback