Real World Speed
Performance profile from 59,965 user samples
40,633 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% MSI(1462 3750)
Poor: 68% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
19,332 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 121% Gigabyte(1458 4001) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 98% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 98% Great: 121%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.2 % 113 % Much faster effective speed.
+52%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
275 fps 474 fps Much better texture detail.
+72%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
222 fps 378 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+70%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
266 fps 387 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+45%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps 241 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+35%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps 523 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+73%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
247 fps 403 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+63%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
283 fps 413 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+46%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps 257 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+35%
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps 234 fps Much Better CSGO fps.
+47%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps 182 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+36%
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 125 fps Much Better PUBG fps.
+31%
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 118 fps Much Better GTAV fps.
+57%
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps 221 fps Better LoL fps.
+28%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
287 fps +2% 280 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,829,707 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.39 % 1.72 % Higher market share.
+24%
Value
Value For Money
65.1 % Much better value.
+34%
48.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
130 % Slightly more popular.
+13%
115 %
Price
Price (score)
$270 Much cheaper.
+51%
$550
Age
Newest
7 Months 3 Months Much more recent.
+57%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
325 fps 494 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+52%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps 401 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+58%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
301 fps 453 fps Much better lighting effects.
+50%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps 374 fps Much better reflection handling.
+58%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $83
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback