Real World Speed
Performance profile from 86,000 user samples
30,715 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 59% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 59% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 627
55,285 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 37% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 33% PwrHis(1787 2359) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 33% Great: 37%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.1 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+80%
35 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
280 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+120%
127 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+40%
105 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+89%
124 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+112%
141 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
153 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+40%
109 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
246 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+89%
130 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 fps 133 fps +3%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+81%
66 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+74%
43 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
183 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+39%
132 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+36%
75 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
63 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+49%
42 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
306 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+235%
91 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+72%
76 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+90%
62 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,309,103 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % Hugely higher market share.
+312%
0.24 %
Value
Value For Money
71.2 % Better value.
+16%
61.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
128 % Much more popular.
+32%
97 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $135 Much cheaper.
+36%
Age
Newest
8 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
54 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
231 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
137 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
194 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+104%
89.2 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps Much better reflection handling.
+68%
130 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps Much better texture detail.
+37%
175 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
171 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+104%
83.8 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback