Real World Speed
Performance profile from 200,168 user samples
131,487 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 63% Asus(1043 86BE) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 652
68,681 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 31% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 31% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 96th / 652
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.6 % Much faster effective speed.
+65%
41.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
91.3 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+86%
49 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
92.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+61%
57.5 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.7 fps Faster multi rendering.
+13%
58.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
79.7 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+48%
54 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.1 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+57%
62.5 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
125 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+103%
61.5 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
72.9 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
62.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
84.6 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+37%
61.9 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps 140 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+9%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+43%
84 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+52%
53 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+55%
49 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
183 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+39%
132 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+17%
88 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
63 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+33%
48 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
306 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+181%
109 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
131 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+35%
96 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+42%
82 Fps
Market Share
Based on 38,413,255 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+293%
0.27 %
Value
Value For Money
70.7 % 78.6 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % More popular.
+23%
62 %
Price
Price (score)
$230 $126 Much cheaper.
+45%
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+58%
53 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
86.6 fps +5% 82.6 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
76.4 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+68%
45.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
77.3 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+9%
71.1 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
68.2 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+60%
42.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback