Real World Speed
Performance profile from 56,999 user samples
18,412 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
38,587 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 33% MSI(1462 3411)
Poor: 33% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 70th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+51%
43.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
237 fps +4% 227 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
130 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+45%
161 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
169 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+42%
119 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
266 fps 266 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
139 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
246 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+34%
184 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+44%
126 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 139 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+9%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+43%
83 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+28%
57 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+42%
49 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+35%
134 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+17%
88 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+25%
48 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
283 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+159%
109 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,150,487 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+197%
0.31 %
Value
Value For Money
70.9 % +1% 70.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
140 % Much more popular.
+59%
88 %
Price
Price (score)
$220 $148 Much cheaper.
+33%
Age
Newest
6 Months Hugely more recent.
+84%
37 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+56%
192 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
231 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+33%
174 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps Much better lighting effects.
+79%
157 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
217 fps Much better reflection handling.
+34%
162 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback