Real World Speed
Performance profile from 175,252 user samples
24,148 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 625
151,104 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 41% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
50.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
239 fps 259 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+8%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps +5% 140 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
188 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+35%
126 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 298 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+13%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
160 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
147 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
248 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+17%
212 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+39%
132 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 155 fps Better CSGO Fps.
+22%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+29%
93 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Better PUBG Fps.
+25%
59 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+27%
55 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+13%
160 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
103 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+9%
95 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+15%
53 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
283 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+79%
158 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,549,003 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.9 % Higher market share.
+23%
0.73 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 84.9 % Slightly better value.
+14%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
143 % Much more popular.
+46%
98 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $140 Much cheaper.
+33%
Age
Newest
7 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
41 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+40%
215 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
182 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps Much better lighting effects.
+52%
185 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps Better reflection handling.
+27%
171 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback