CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
221 EFps +2% 217 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
72 EFps 78 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
83 EFps 120 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+45%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 116 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+47%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps 128 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+27%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 215,894 user samples
145,400 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% MSI(1462 3793) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Zotac(19DA 5543)
Poor: 63% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 661
70,494 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 79% Sapphire(1DA2 E416) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 79% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 661
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.6 % 87.3 % Faster effective speed.
+27%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
91.5 fps 108 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
92.1 fps 121 fps Much better reflection handling.
+31%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.6 fps 95.1 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+45%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
79.5 fps 110 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.5 fps 117 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+19%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
124 fps 127 fps +2%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
73.5 fps 100 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+36%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
85.1 fps 115 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
Market Share
Based on 41,966,240 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+104%
0.45 %
Value
Value For Money
70.7 % +2% 69 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % 82 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Cheaper.
+23%
$300
Age
Newest
25 Months 14 Months Much more recent.
+44%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
86.2 fps 191 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+122%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
76.5 fps 84.2 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+10%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
77.3 fps 162 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+110%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
68.5 fps 79.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 6GB AMD 5600 XT is a slightly cheaper, BIOS restricted, version of the 8GB 5700. The majority of 5600 XT’s should operate reasonably quietly as the single fan reference design was skipped for this release. Although the reference design is absent there are, however, several variants which range in performance between the GTX 1660S and the RTX 2060. Performance is more varied than usual because of last minute BIOS changes. The best versions of the 5600 XT (Sapphire Pulse) were distributed to reviewers (good luck finding one of these at MSRP). These models are capable, with BIOS updates, of performance that almost matches the RTX 2060. At $280 USD the higher performing SKUs could make sense for users that are happy to tinker with or return faulty hardware. During our GTAV testing reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appears on several Navi and Vega cards). Whilst playing Project Cars 2 our 5600 XT PC crashed several times. Given the vast number of software (and hardware) problems since day one of the 5000 series launch, it’s ironic that AMD’s latest 20.1.3 driver does not even offer an option to skip the installation of a boatload of new system shortcuts, gimmicks and other bloatware. [Jan '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback