COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
About
Game EFps  
+0%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		221 EFps 270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+22%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		72 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+12% 		64 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		83 EFps 85 EFps +2%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		79 EFps 79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		101 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+10% 		92 EFps
Effective Speed 
+21%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 173,579 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
109,912 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% MSI(1462 3792)
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 86D0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 56th / 651
63,667 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 2311)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		72.2 % Faster effective speed.
+21% 		59.5 %
Average Score 
+6%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		92.4 fps Better lighting effects.
+23% 		74.9 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		65.8 fps 71 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		80.1 fps +3% 78.1 fps
Overclocked Score 
+2%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		99 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+18% 		84.2 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		71 fps 77.7 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		85.1 fps 86.2 fps +1%
Value & Sentiment 
+37%
Market Share
Based on 35,843,985 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		1.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+157% 		0.42 %
Value
Value For Money 		74.4 % Slightly better value.
+6% 		70.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		140 % 143 % +2%
Price
Price (score) 		$230 $200 Cheaper.
+13%
Nice To Haves 
+11%
Age
Newest 		20 Months More recent.
+17% 		24 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		123 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+51% 		81.3 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		86.1 fps 113 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		76.2 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+18% 		64.8 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		92.6 fps Better reflection handling.
+28% 		72.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		77.7 fps 101 fps Better texture detail.
+30%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		68.8 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21% 		56.7 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 72.2%
Average Bench 59.5%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
109,912
63,667
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback