Real World Speed
Performance profile from 43,510 user samples
21,109 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Poor: 59% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
22,401 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% XFX(1682 9587)
Worst Bench: 53% XFX(1682 9587)
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
60.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 320 fps Much better texture detail.
+33%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 158 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps +0% 233 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
146 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
266 fps 362 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
163 fps 165 fps +1%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
248 fps 251 fps +1%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+21%
151 fps
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 154 fps Better CSGO fps.
+21%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+28%
93 fps
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Slightly Better PUBG fps.
+6%
69 fps
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps +0% 70 fps
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Slightly Better LoL fps.
+11%
164 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps 108 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps 70 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+16%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
283 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+38%
205 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,847,510 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % Much higher market share.
+50%
0.66 %
Value
Value For Money
74.5 % Slightly better value.
+14%
65.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
136 % More popular.
+25%
109 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 +5% $220
Age
Newest
7 Months Much more recent.
+36%
11 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+20%
249 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
233 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
213 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
225 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
219 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
204 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback