CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
210 EFps 225 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
62 EFps 69 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+11%
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
71 EFps 85 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+20%
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
68 EFps 82 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+21%
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
88 EFps 103 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,367 user samples
30,715 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 59% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 59% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 627
39,652 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 76% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 76% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.1 % 85.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
280 fps 290 fps +4%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 183 fps Faster multi rendering.
+24%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps 325 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+39%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps 350 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
153 fps 193 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+26%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
246 fps 370 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+50%
Market Share
Based on 22,315,070 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % Hugely higher market share.
+111%
0.47 %
Value
Value For Money
71.2 % Much better value.
+34%
53 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
127 % Slightly more popular.
+13%
112 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 Much cheaper.
+45%
$380
Age
Newest
8 Months Much more recent.
+70%
27 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
231 fps 242 fps +5%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 571 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+116%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 304 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+67%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps 227 fps +4%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 484 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+102%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
171 fps 288 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+68%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback