Real World Speed
Performance profile from 50,072 user samples
18,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
31,704 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Worst Bench: 68% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 68% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66 % 84.7 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 483 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+101%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 182 fps Faster multi rendering.
+24%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps 323 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+39%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
171 fps 284 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+66%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 575 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+118%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
156 fps 192 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+23%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
246 fps 371 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+51%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 302 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+66%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 157 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+23%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps 122 fps +3%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps 91 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+24%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 76 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+9%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps 186 fps +3%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps 125 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+21%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps 86 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+42%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
283 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+66%
170 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,226,740 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+80%
0.51 %
Value
Value For Money
71.1 % Slightly better value.
+9%
65 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
142 % More popular.
+23%
115 %
Price
Price (score)
$220 Cheaper.
+29%
$309
Age
Newest
6 Months Much more recent.
+76%
25 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps 350 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps 239 fps +3%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps 295 fps +5%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps 227 fps +4%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback