Real World Speed
Performance profile from 322,469 user samples
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 714
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.3 % 86.6 % Faster effective speed.
+27%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
90.3 fps 111 fps Better lighting effects.
+23%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.8 fps 108 fps Better reflection handling.
+19%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.2 fps 92.3 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+44%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.4 fps 132 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+68%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
97.1 fps 122 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+26%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
121 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.5 fps 95.4 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+39%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.7 fps 143 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+73%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps 223 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+74%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 Fps 121 Fps +1%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 104 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+29%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps 88 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+16%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
183 Fps 194 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+6%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps 127 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
63 Fps 88 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+38%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
306 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+52%
202 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps 125 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 67,400,555 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.72 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,300%
0.03 %
Value
Value For Money
113 % Hugely better value.
+121%
51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % Much more popular.
+43%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$143 Much cheaper.
+64%
$400
Age
Newest
61 Months More recent.
+24%
80 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
84.8 fps 197 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+132%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.6 fps 78.4 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+5%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
75.7 fps 178 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+135%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70 fps 75.8 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback