CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
221 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+27%
174 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
72 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+64%
44 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
83 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+80%
46 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+84%
43 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+87%
54 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,177,494 user samples
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 715
946,701 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 33% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 27% MSI(1462 8C96)
Poor: 27% Great: 33%
SPEED RANK: 172nd / 715
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.3 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+133%
29.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
90.3 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+142%
37.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.8 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+121%
41.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.2 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+73%
37.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.4 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+102%
38.8 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
97.1 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+123%
43.5 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
121 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+149%
48.5 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.5 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+78%
38.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.7 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+94%
42.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,936,987 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.73 % 1.81 % Hugely higher market share.
+148%
Value
Value For Money
77.5 % 118 % Much better value.
+52%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % 77 % +1%
Price
Price (score)
$209 $59 Much cheaper.
+72%
Age
Newest
63 Months Much more recent.
+32%
92 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
84.8 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+107%
41 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.6 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+160%
28.7 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
75.7 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+101%
37.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+167%
26.2 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. [Oct '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback