Real World Speed
Performance profile from 132,629 user samples
22,299 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 69% Zotac(19DA 3543) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 61% Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
110,330 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% EVGA(3842 4995)
Worst Bench: 69% Gigabyte(1458 36CF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.8 % 79 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
239 fps 327 fps Much better texture detail.
+37%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 195 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+33%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps 292 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+25%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps 198 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 380 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+44%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
153 fps 213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+39%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
246 fps 324 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 197 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+54%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
119 fps 124 fps +4%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps 81 fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+10%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 80 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+15%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
181 fps 218 fps Better LoL Fps.
+20%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
103 fps 115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
60 fps 83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+37%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
283 fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+17%
242 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,993,898 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.98 % Much higher market share.
+75%
0.56 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % Hugely better value.
+90%
39 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % More popular.
+26%
104 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 Much cheaper.
+56%
$480
Age
Newest
7 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
53 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
298 fps 362 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+21%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
231 fps 319 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+38%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
280 fps 318 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+14%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
217 fps 287 fps Much better reflection handling.
+32%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $320Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback