Real World Speed
Performance profile from 118,795 user samples
12,779 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Zotac(19DA 2543)
Worst Bench: 60% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 60% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 621
106,016 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 60% Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.1 % 77.9 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
239 fps 322 fps Much better texture detail.
+35%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 194 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+32%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps 289 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps 198 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
265 fps 377 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+42%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
155 fps 214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
247 fps 323 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps 227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps 199 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+61%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps 123 fps +4%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps 81 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+9%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 80 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+19%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
180 fps 218 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+21%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps 115 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
64 fps 83 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+30%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
291 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+23%
236 fps
Market Share
Based on 19,395,598 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.81 % Much higher market share.
+33%
0.61 %
Value
Value For Money
71.2 % Hugely better value.
+85%
38.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
120 % More popular.
+18%
102 %
Price
Price (score)
$220 Much cheaper.
+54%
$480
Age
Newest
5 Months Hugely more recent.
+90%
51 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps 358 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+19%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps 321 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+38%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
282 fps 312 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+11%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
219 fps 284 fps Better reflection handling.
+30%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback