CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
232 EFps +1% 229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps 110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+28%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
97 EFps 138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+42%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps 127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+37%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
116 EFps 157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+35%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 683,708 user samples
428,800 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 103rd / 715
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 715
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
71.4 % 98.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+38%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
89.2 fps 124 fps Much better lighting effects.
+39%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
91.6 fps 139 fps Much better reflection handling.
+52%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
110 fps 118 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.4 fps 140 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+79%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
95.4 fps 133 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+39%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
124 fps 146 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps 122 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+5%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.4 fps 151 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+83%
Market Share
Based on 67,936,610 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.99 % Hugely higher market share.
+503%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
86.8 % 155 % Much better value.
+79%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % Much more popular.
+66%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$195 $150 Cheaper.
+23%
Age
Newest
56 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
60 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
89.9 fps 229 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+155%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.5 fps 98.2 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
81.8 fps 205 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+151%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70.4 fps 94.3 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+34%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. The 1660 Super has 14 Gbps GDDR6 (versus 12Gbps GDDR6 for the 1660 Ti and 8Gbps GDDR5 for the 1660). The 1660 range of cards sit in the sweet spot for many gamers because they offer superb 1080p EFps in popular titles and they are relatively hassle free in terms of noise, compatibility and stability. The 1660S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Shop prices will determine which 1660 series card represents the best value over time but at today's prices the 1660 Super effectively undercuts the 1660 Ti by $50 USD thus challenging the RX 590 in terms of overall value at 1080p. The next step up from the 1660S would be to the $325 RTX 2060[Oct '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback