Real World Speed
Performance profile from 297,475 user samples
85,535 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 29% Gigabyte(1458 36C7)
Worst Bench: 24% HP(103C 82DF) 2GB
Poor: 24% Great: 29%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 639
211,940 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 21% Gigabyte(1458 36D1)
Worst Bench: 18% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
SPEED RANK: 151st / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
26.5 % Much faster effective speed.
19.1 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
103 fps Much better lighting effects.
66.1 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
76.9 fps Much faster multi rendering.
54.1 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
94.3 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
68.9 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
117 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
74.6 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
81.5 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
58.5 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
104 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
76.2 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
110 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 Fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
45 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
38 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
36 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
119 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
109 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
69 Fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
51 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
33 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
25 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps +4% 128 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
84 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
54 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
45 Fps 46 Fps +2%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
66 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
46 Fps
Market Share
Based on 30,002,594 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % 0.8 % Hugely higher market share.
Value For Money
36.9 % 41.1 % Better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 89 % More popular.
Price (score)
$170 $110 Much cheaper.
59 Months More recent.
77 Months
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
93.9 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
50 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
109 fps Much better peak texture detail.
72.9 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
79.8 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
44.3 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
86.1 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
45 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
96.6 fps Much better texture detail.
65 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
72.1 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
38.9 fps

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here[Aug '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $157Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback