Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,041,874 user samples
809,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Gigabyte(1458 367A)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 8508)
Poor: 45% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 103rd / 685
232,326 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 46% Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% MSI(1462 8D92)
Poor: 39% Great: 46%
SPEED RANK: 116th / 685
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
50.2 % Faster effective speed.
42.9 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
61.3 fps Better lighting effects.
55.1 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
71.5 fps Better reflection handling.
58.8 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.8 fps Much faster multi rendering.
51.9 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
62.2 fps Faster NBody calculation.
50.5 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
69 fps Better peak lighting effects.
60 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
93.1 fps Better peak reflection handling.
77.8 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.2 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
65.4 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
67.6 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
53.7 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
148 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps +3% 91 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
119 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
189 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
134 Fps
Market Share
Based on 55,356,930 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.2 % 1.37 % Higher market share.
Value For Money
35 % 65.6 % Hugely better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % 78 % More popular.
Price (score)
$340 $155 Much cheaper.
97 Months 41 Months Much more recent.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
69.7 fps Better peak texture detail.
54.9 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
59.8 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
48.6 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
62.4 fps Better texture detail.
50.2 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54 fps Faster complex splatting.
45.1 fps

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]


The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $400Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback