Real World Speed
Performance profile from 227,719 user samples
160,682 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 70% Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 651
67,037 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 46% PwrHis(1787 2358) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 46% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 76th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
82.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+54%
53.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
104 fps Much better lighting effects.
+53%
67.9 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
92.6 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
61 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
96.7 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+67%
57.9 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
119 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+64%
72.4 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
102 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
63.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+77%
60.4 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+26%
156 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+30%
93 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+48%
55 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+75%
45 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+25%
173 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+15%
100 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+45%
67 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+50%
55 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+83%
133 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
153 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+47%
104 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+82%
50 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+17%
104 Fps
Market Share
Based on 35,842,826 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % Hugely higher market share.
+165%
0.17 %
Value
Value For Money
35 % 39.1 % Better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % More popular.
+13%
92 %
Price
Price (score)
$560 $325 Much cheaper.
+42%
Age
Newest
66 Months 65 Months +2%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
122 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+92%
63.7 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
117 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+30%
89.7 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.1 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+20%
80.7 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
110 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+81%
60.7 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps Better texture detail.
+24%
81.5 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
84.7 fps Faster complex splatting.
+10%
76.9 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback