Real World Speed
Performance profile from 159,981 user samples
116,407 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 66% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 66% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 611
43,574 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 55% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 611
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+45%
66.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
319 fps Better texture detail.
+23%
259 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+50%
127 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
284 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+65%
172 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
194 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+9%
178 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
378 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+32%
286 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
132 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
324 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+80%
180 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+20%
187 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
202 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+28%
158 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+37%
59 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+53%
80 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+78%
46 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
220 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+27%
174 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+16%
100 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+43%
68 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+56%
53 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+32%
117 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+70%
51 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+24%
99 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+24%
98 fps
Market Share
Based on 15,593,933 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.67 % Hugely higher market share.
+158%
0.26 %
Value
Value For Money
80.8 % Slightly better value.
+7%
75.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
118 % Slightly more popular.
+13%
104 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $304 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
46 Months 45 Months +2%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+70%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
321 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+95%
165 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
310 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
193 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+79%
157 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $75
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $110SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback