Real World Speed
Performance profile from 296,147 user samples
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 81st / 701
82,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 45% PwrHis(1787 2358) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 121st / 701
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79 % Much faster effective speed.
+59%
49.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.6 fps Much better lighting effects.
+54%
64.1 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
115 fps Much better reflection handling.
+59%
72.4 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
97 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+53%
63.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
97.7 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+65%
59.2 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+61%
68.9 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
132 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+72%
76.9 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+60%
65.7 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+73%
61.9 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+26%
156 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+30%
93 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+48%
55 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+75%
45 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+25%
173 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+15%
100 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+45%
67 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+50%
55 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+83%
133 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
153 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+47%
104 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+82%
50 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+17%
104 Fps
Market Share
Based on 61,873,538 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+733%
0.03 %
Value
Value For Money
38.9 % 39.2 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
62 %
Price
Price (score)
$640 $400 Much cheaper.
+38%
Age
Newest
97 Months 96 Months +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
113 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
94.4 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.4 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+109%
46.7 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
100 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
86.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
87.9 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+96%
44.9 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $420Nvidia RTX 3060 $394Crucial MX500 250GB $35
Intel Core i5-12600K $325Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $516Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $141
Intel Core i5-12400F $215Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $1,050Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $75
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $96
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $37
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $115G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $507SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $40
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback