Real World Speed
Performance profile from 134,886 user samples
126,125 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 74% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 613
8,761 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(174B E331)
Worst Bench: 61% Sapphire(174B E331)
Poor: 61% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.1 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
78.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps 332 fps +4%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+60%
120 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
286 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
238 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
196 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
167 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
375 fps +2% 368 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
212 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+64%
129 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+24%
260 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
181 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
201 fps 205 fps +2%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+6%
76 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+7%
107 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+9%
89 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+19%
70 fps
Market Share
Based on 17,566,735 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.65 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,200%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
81.2 % Slightly better value.
+6%
76.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
122 % Much more popular.
+45%
84 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $380 Cheaper.
+21%
Age
Newest
49 Months 47 Months +4%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
365 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+44%
253 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
317 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+99%
159 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
310 fps Much better lighting effects.
+38%
224 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+91%
147 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback