Real World Speed
Performance profile from 121,182 user samples
93,860 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 71% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 597
27,322 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% Asus(1043 04B4)
Worst Bench: 23% Asus(1043 04B8)
Poor: 23% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 96th / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.7 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+244%
28.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+219%
101 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+203%
63.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+287%
73.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
195 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+152%
77.3 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
379 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+218%
119 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+227%
65.7 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
325 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+296%
82 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+179%
80.6 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
204 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+73%
118 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+104%
40 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Hugely Better Overwatch fps.
+104%
57 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
230 fps Hugely Better League of Legends fps.
+99%
115 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+130%
42 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 fps.
+133%
66 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Hugely Better World of Tanks fps.
+159%
46 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+181%
44 fps
Market Share
Based on 12,741,976 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.77 % Hugely higher market share.
+166%
0.29 %
Value
Value For Money
73.8 % Slightly better value.
+13%
65.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
113 % Much more popular.
+38%
82 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $104 Hugely cheaper.
+81%
Age
Newest
43 Months 28 Months Much more recent.
+35%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
363 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+312%
88.2 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
321 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+280%
84.5 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
305 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+314%
73.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
280 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+252%
79.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $332Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback