Real World Speed
Performance profile from 138,706 user samples
116,091 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 68% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 613
22,615 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 126% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 83% MSI(1462 3681)
Poor: 83% Great: 126%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.3 % 111 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
316 fps 480 fps Much better texture detail.
+52%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
190 fps +5% 181 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps 321 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
194 fps 283 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+46%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
376 fps 572 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+52%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
191 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps 369 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps 300 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+34%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
200 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+27%
158 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps 123 fps +2%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 99 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+22%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 82 fps +1%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
218 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+14%
191 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps 128 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+11%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps 110 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+13%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps 87 fps +5%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 88 fps +1%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps 123 fps +2%
Market Share
Based on 17,766,378 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.61 % 0.75 % Higher market share.
+23%
Value
Value For Money
80.5 % 136 % Much better value.
+69%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
121 % Much more popular.
+36%
89 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $270 Much cheaper.
+44%
Age
Newest
49 Months 22 Months Much more recent.
+55%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
372 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+6%
351 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
319 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+34%
238 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
310 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+8%
288 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
277 fps Better reflection handling.
+23%
226 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $101
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback