COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
Effective Speed 
+1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 306,083 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		79 % +1% 78 %
Average Score 
+1%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		98.6 fps +0% 98.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		115 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+10% 		105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		97 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9% 		88.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		97.7 fps 114 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+17%
Overclocked Score 
+3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		111 fps +2% 109 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		132 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18% 		112 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		105 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+12% 		94.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		107 fps 128 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
Game FPS 
+3%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		196 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+24% 		158 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		121 Fps +4% 117 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		81 Fps 89 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+10%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		80 Fps 82 Fps +3%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+14% 		189 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		115 Fps 123 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+7%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		98 Fps 108 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+11%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		82 Fps 87 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+6%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		244 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+23% 		198 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		153 Fps +1% 150 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		91 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+16% 		79 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		121 Fps 130 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+8%
Value & Sentiment 
+25%
Market Share
Based on 67,450,494 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.24 % Hugely higher market share.
+380% 		0.05 %
Value
Value For Money 		33.5 % 109 % Hugely better value.
+225%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		66 % More popular.
+14% 		58 %
Price
Price (score) 		$560 $170 Much cheaper.
+70%
Nice To Haves 
+18%
Age
Newest 		107 Months 80 Months More recent.
+25%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		113 fps 175 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+55%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		97.4 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26% 		77.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		100 fps 155 fps Much better texture detail.
+55%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		87.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18% 		74.5 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 79%
Average Bench 78%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
214,030
92,053
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback