Real World Speed
Performance profile from 96,941 user samples
90,206 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 61% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 61% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 597
6,735 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 132% Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Nitro+ Vega 64
Worst Bench: 81% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 81% Great: 132%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
96.3 % 118 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
317 fps 526 fps Much better texture detail.
+66%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps +4% 184 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
284 fps 346 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
193 fps 288 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+49%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
378 fps 629 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+66%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
193 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
324 fps 402 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+24%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps 306 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+36%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
209 fps 221 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+6%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps 106 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+31%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps 125 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+8%
Market Share
Based on 12,116,191 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.78 % Hugely higher market share.
+144%
0.32 %
Value
Value For Money
73.5 % 92.1 % Better value.
+25%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
113 % Much more popular.
+51%
75 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $530 +4%
Age
Newest
42 Months 15 Months Much more recent.
+64%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps 366 fps +1%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+31%
243 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
306 fps +0% 305 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
279 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
230 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback