Real World Speed
Performance profile from 466,376 user samples
127,332 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% MSI(1462 3233)
Poor: 68% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 634
339,044 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
Worst Bench: 50% Gigabyte(1458 3722)
Poor: 50% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+45%
54.1 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps Much better lighting effects.
+58%
201 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+30%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
289 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+47%
196 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
368 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
220 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
211 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+37%
154 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+54%
209 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+31%
150 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+24%
98 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+26%
64 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+33%
60 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+46%
148 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+15%
100 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+77%
55 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+61%
51 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+33%
184 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
153 Fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+32%
116 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+50%
61 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+27%
95 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,745,478 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.53 % 1.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+249%
Value
Value For Money
38.6 % 75.4 % Hugely better value.
+95%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % +3% 103 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $170 Much cheaper.
+65%
Age
Newest
56 Months 41 Months More recent.
+27%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
316 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+68%
188 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
374 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+76%
213 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
222 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
167 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps Much better reflection handling.
+63%
175 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps Much better texture detail.
+70%
192 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
154 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback