Real World Speed
Performance profile from 879,914 user samples
132,444 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 63% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
747,470 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3739)
Worst Bench: 51% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
77.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+38%
56.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps Much better texture detail.
+54%
212 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+30%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
208 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21%
163 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
379 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+58%
240 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+32%
161 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+44%
223 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
177 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Better CSGO Fps.
+23%
160 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+22%
102 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Better PUBG Fps.
+18%
68 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+34%
60 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
218 fps Better LoL Fps.
+20%
181 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+14%
101 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+40%
70 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+45%
57 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
242 fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+12%
217 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
151 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+15%
132 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Better WoW Fps.
+15%
76 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+14%
105 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.55 % 4.45 % Hugely higher market share.
+709%
Value
Value For Money
38.4 % 46.8 % Better value.
+22%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 127 % More popular.
+20%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $285 Much cheaper.
+41%
Age
Newest
54 Months 40 Months More recent.
+26%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
357 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+47%
243 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+51%
210 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
311 fps Much better lighting effects.
+40%
222 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps Much better reflection handling.
+46%
194 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback