Real World Speed
Performance profile from 839,056 user samples
132,444 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 63% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
706,612 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 1435)
Worst Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3302)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
77.8 % 78.3 % +1%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps +5% 311 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps 201 fps +4%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps 289 fps +0%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps 224 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+13%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
379 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+9%
349 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps 218 fps +2%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps +2% 315 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps 245 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+10%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 fps 198 fps +1%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 fps +1% 122 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 fps +1% 80 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps +3% 78 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
218 fps +3% 211 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps +0% 115 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 fps +3% 95 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps +1% 82 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
242 fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+9%
222 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
151 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+5%
144 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 89 fps +1%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 fps 128 fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 21,549,389 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.56 % 3.88 % Hugely higher market share.
+593%
Value
Value For Money
38.4 % 50.3 % Much better value.
+31%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 111 % +5%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $369 Cheaper.
+23%
Age
Newest
54 Months 41 Months More recent.
+24%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
357 fps +4% 343 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps +2% 311 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
311 fps +1% 308 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps 287 fps +1%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback