Real World Speed
Performance profile from 132,139 user samples
120,491 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 70% Asus(1043 855C) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 613
11,648 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% EVGA(3842 1266) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 83% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
95.9 % +4% 92.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
316 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
273 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
190 fps 219 fps Faster multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
282 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
262 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
193 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+11%
174 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
375 fps Better peak texture detail.
+24%
302 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
214 fps 240 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
323 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
282 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+18%
191 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
201 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+26%
159 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 127 fps +4%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 90 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+12%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
220 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+28%
172 fps
Market Share
Based on 17,003,969 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.63 % 1.24 % Hugely higher market share.
+97%
Value
Value For Money
80.1 % 113 % Much better value.
+41%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
120 % Much more popular.
+58%
76 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $270 Much cheaper.
+44%
Age
Newest
48 Months 3 Months Hugely more recent.
+94%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+12%
324 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
319 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+26%
253 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
305 fps +2% 298 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
277 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
236 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback