Real World Speed
Performance profile from 321,958 user samples
161,786 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 69% Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 651
160,172 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% MSI(1462 375A)
Worst Bench: 70% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79.5 % +2% 78.1 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.5 fps +1% 97.7 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
117 fps Better reflection handling.
101 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
97.3 fps 98.1 fps +1%
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
98 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
90.2 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
114 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
106 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
145 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
138 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
108 fps 111 fps +3%
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
110 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
96.1 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
156 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 133 Fps Slightly Better Fortnite Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 88 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
74 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Better LoL Fps.
181 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps +4% 110 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
78 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 82 Fps +1%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps 263 Fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
153 Fps +4% 147 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps 93 Fps +2%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 133 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
Market Share
Based on 36,086,563 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % 1.3 % Hugely higher market share.
Value For Money
33.7 % 66.1 % Hugely better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % 149 % Much more popular.
Price (score)
$560 $280 Much cheaper.
67 Months 21 Months Much more recent.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
116 fps Better peak texture detail.
97.9 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
98.9 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
82.2 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps Better texture detail.
88.2 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
87.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
74.7 fps

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]


The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback