Real World Speed
Performance profile from 200,038 user samples
132,444 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 63% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
67,594 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 29% Zotac(19DA 2376) 2GB
Worst Bench: 23% Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
Poor: 23% Great: 29%
SPEED RANK: 107th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
77.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+195%
26.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+235%
97.4 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+150%
77.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+204%
94.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+173%
72.4 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
379 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+241%
111 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+161%
81.6 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
322 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+210%
104 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+178%
80.1 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+61%
123 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+149%
50 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+110%
38 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
218 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+79%
122 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+66%
69 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+150%
33 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
242 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+82%
133 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
151 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+83%
83 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+95%
45 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+83%
66 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.55 % Much higher market share.
+53%
0.36 %
Value
Value For Money
38.4 % 69.4 % Hugely better value.
+81%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % Much more popular.
+45%
73 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $90 Hugely cheaper.
+81%
Age
Newest
54 Months 51 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
357 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+203%
118 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+237%
94.5 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
311 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+199%
104 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+230%
86.1 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here[Aug '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback