Real World Speed
Performance profile from 692,147 user samples
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79 % 104 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.6 fps 128 fps Better lighting effects.
+30%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
115 fps 119 fps +3%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
97 fps 174 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+79%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
97.7 fps 125 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps 143 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
132 fps 170 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+29%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps 187 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+78%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps 136 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+27%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
196 Fps 235 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+20%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 147 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+21%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 104 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+28%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 101 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+28%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 237 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+10%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps 124 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+8%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
98 Fps 115 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps 106 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+29%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps 281 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+15%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
153 Fps 176 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+15%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
91 Fps 102 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+12%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 164 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+36%
Market Share
Based on 67,412,593 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % 0.74 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
Value
Value For Money
33.5 % 123 % Hugely better value.
+268%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % 67 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$560 $200 Much cheaper.
+64%
Age
Newest
107 Months 66 Months Much more recent.
+38%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
113 fps 145 fps Better peak texture detail.
+28%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.4 fps 113 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+16%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
100 fps 129 fps Better texture detail.
+29%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
87.9 fps 105 fps Faster complex splatting.
+19%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback