Real World Speed
Performance profile from 252,063 user samples
138,198 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Zotac(19DA 2368) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 55% EVGA(3842 2983)
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 650
113,865 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC7)
Worst Bench: 64% Gigabyte(1458 3FCF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 64% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 56th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
62.9 % 72.6 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
78.6 fps 93.1 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
79 fps Faster multi rendering.
+13%
70.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
72.7 fps 77.8 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+7%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
89.1 fps 101 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+13%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
84.5 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+10%
76.9 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
80.6 fps 83.3 fps +3%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
183 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+43%
128 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 Fps 120 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+14%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 Fps 81 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+15%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
61 Fps 76 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+25%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
191 Fps +4% 183 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps +2% 102 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
60 Fps 63 Fps +5%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
207 Fps 306 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+48%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
136 Fps +4% 131 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
111 Fps 117 Fps Slightly Better WoT Fps.
+5%
Market Share
Based on 35,648,502 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.42 % 1.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
Value
Value For Money
29.8 % 74.8 % Hugely better value.
+151%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % 138 % Much more popular.
+39%
Price
Price (score)
$500 $230 Much cheaper.
+54%
Age
Newest
74 Months 20 Months Much more recent.
+73%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.4 fps 90.9 fps +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
83.8 fps 83.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
72 fps 79.7 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+11%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
81.9 fps 84 fps +3%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
74.2 fps 74.5 fps +0%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
64.9 fps 71.7 fps Faster complex splatting.
+10%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Nvidia GTX 980 is the new top end Maxwell based Nvidia GPU. The Maxwell architecture offers significantly higher clock for clock performance when compared to Kepler based cards from the previous generation. Comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 970 shows that the 970 only lags by around 17% in terms of performance but it's priced nearly 40% lower making the GTX 970 far better value for money card. Even though the GTX 970 beats the 980 in terms of value, the 980 still destroys previous generation cards. Comparing the GTX 980 and 780 Ti shows that the Newer 980 offers around 14% better performance at a 25% price discount. Nvidia have changed the price/performance landscape with their new Maxwell architecture and now pose a serious threat to AMDs high end GPU market share. The new GTX 980/970 cards replace the now discontinued GTX 780 Ti, 780 and 770. [Sep '14 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $144Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback